<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>I2C GPS Shield</title>
		<description>Discuss I2C GPS Shield</description>
		<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:59:56 --500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.dsscircuits.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/62/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Wayne Truchsess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Can you send me a screen shot of the values you are getting? support@dsscirc uits.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wayne Truchsess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:33:14 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-352</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Panagiotis says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-351</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Additional info: The led has turned off so I assume the GPS has 3D fix but the values remain the same.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Panagiotis</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:55:46 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-351</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Panagiotis says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-350</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi, I have the same problem as John Nelson. I tried both uncomment the delay(1) and restore the default update rate with no success. Still, the returned values are the same with John Nelson. I tested the board with an UNO without the battery. Do you have any suggestion? Thank you.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Panagiotis</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:52:51 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-350</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wayne Truchsess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-305</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Actually the easiest way to compare sensitivities between receivers would be to look at the PDOP, HDOP and VDOP values (registers 0x19 - 0x1E). You should be able to compare these numbers across different GPS vendors also. There's a little write up about the parameters here ( http://gpsinformation.net/main/dopnontech.htm ) if u want to check it out but basically the lower the number the better with a 1 being the best possible accuracy.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wayne Truchsess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 07:14:26 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-305</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jwangbb says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-304</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And you need to also modify the sample code on Uno to see it. Do you have code reading raw NMEA sentences already made?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jwangbb</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 01:47:51 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-304</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jwangbb says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-303</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wayne: I think I can get satellite's C/No info from NMEA Output Sentences $GPGSV to verify the sensitivity of the receiver. However, this seems to involve to modify the shields firmware. Could you please tell me is it the easiest way to go? And if so could you please tell me how to upload the code to shields mega rather than the Uno?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jwangbb</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 01:45:28 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-303</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wayne Truchsess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-296</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It's probably best to uncomment the line. Long story short the reason for the delay is because the ATmega328p chip needs a 4.7us delay between sending the stop bit and before sending the next start bit when requesting data. Most times it's not a problem but sometimes it creeps up so the 1ms delay extends the hold time long enough to exceed the 4.7us.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wayne Truchsess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:51:35 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-296</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>D9W says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-295</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wayne: is it normal under the Arduino 1.0 IDE to have to uncomment the delay(1) under "void loop(){" ??- The example sketch_1_0 printed -1 for UTC Time until I removed the '//']]></description>
			<dc:creator>D9W</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:36:54 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-295</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jwangbb says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-294</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Status Register = FF]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jwangbb</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:55:00 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-294</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wayne Truchsess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-293</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What number is the status register reporting on the display?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wayne Truchsess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:29:08 --500</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.dsscircuits.com/i2c-gps-shield.html#comment-293</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
